The case for the electric tractor
...As the hype around biofuel already begins to dissipate, serious researchers and planners are advocating curtailment of long distance transport and the adoption of electric vehicles as one of the most sustainable options to replace the work and carbon footprint of the internal combustion engines.
...Post Carbon Institute's Energy Farm Program is addressing the tension between food vs. fuel, or land vs. energy. In our search for ways to reduce these tensions comes the latest Energy Farm Demonstration Project: The Electric Tractor.
We have made connections with activist and inventor Stephen Heckeroth and are seeking to test cutting edge agricultural equipment for a post-petroleum world. The electric tractor does not compete for food and prime agricultural land for fuel, has a significantly reduced carbon footprint, increases the scale of acreage that can be cultivated, and is easy to operate for the 50 Million New Farmers that Richard Heinberg is calling for in the coming century. Stephen is not the only person who has made the electric tractors. John Howe has been working on retrofits of agricultural equipment powered by electricity.
This week we took a (petroleum-powered) scenic drive through the redwoods to the Mendocino coast to visit Stephen Heckeroth and demo his "Solar Electric Tractor."
...Let's run through some numbers to help us evaluate the land requirements of electric tractors versus tractors operating with biofuel. Electric motors are about 90% efficient at converting energy to work, and solar panels are the most efficient way of converting radiant sunlight energy into electricity (approaching 20% vs 1% or much less for plants). Stephen's tractor can hold 5 kWh of battery packs that will give the same kind of performance in terms of work over a year as the 1700 gallons of diesel fuel in a small tractor. 5 kWh of batteries can be recharged each day with a 1 kW photovoltaic system covering about 40 sq ft (3.7 sq meters) of roof space. By contrast, 43,000 sq ft (4,000 sq m) are in an acre (which is 0.4 hectares).
In terms of fuel dollars, 1700 gallons of diesel cost about $5,100 in 2007. Installing a 1 kW photovoltaic system might cost about $10,000. By investing once in double the annual cost of fuel, a farmer could power a tractor for decades.
Not only does this appear to be an economically wise investment, but electric tractors are a pleasure to use. As you would expect from an electric motor there is no diesel exhaust emissions and no loud engine noise. While driving the tractor we could actually hear birds chirping (a rare experience when operating heavy machinery). With an electric tractor there is no longer a need for engine oil or oil filters, a radiator and coolant, no need for fuel filters, no engine overhauls, and it offers a lower operating cost ($0.50) to charge the 5KW battery pack.
...We plan to put the tractor through its paces and provide data that farmers will find useful as they begin to evaluate the efficacy of this exciting technology. Although in theory we should have great performance from an electric tractor, a lot of questions exist related to how long the tractor can work (similar to the range of an electric car) and whether or not the machine has enough power for the rigorous demands of cultivation. ...
Excerpts only. Photographs and complete text at the original article on GPM. -BA
UPDATE (July 16) from contributor Dave Kimble:
Let's just check that arithmetic. The electric motor is 90% efficient at turning electricity into mechanical energy (work), agreed. But the efficiency of the charging-discharging cycle of the batteries has been left out.
You lose perhaps 30% in charging and 30% in discharging. The efficiency of the current solar panels may be "approaching 20%", but are in fact 14%. The overall efficiency is 0.90 x 0.70 x 0.70 x 0.14 = 0.0617 = 6%, so you would need 16.6 m² of panels, not 3.7 m².
The efficiency from the fully-charged battery to the mechanical work is 0.9 x 0.7 = 0.63 = 63%. As the battery-pack is 5 KW.h , that means you can only put 3.15 KW.h 'on the ground'. This is the sort of size more suited to a lawn-mower rather than a tractor.
UPDATE (July 1) from contributor JMG:
Surprised you didn't mention John G. Howe's electric tractor, which he makes much of in his book, which is on its 3d edition now and the title keeps getting scarier. He is a retired mech. engineer and converted a diesel tractor to electric drive with a solar panel for a shade cover for the driver. Pretty cool. The weight of the batteries is an asset for a tractor.
The End of Fossil Energy by John G. Howe (Amazon entry).
The title is always "The End of Fossil Energy" and the subtitle on the original was "and a plan for sustainability" and I think the 2d ed was "and the last chance for sustainability" and I think the 3d ed might be "and the last chance for survival"
I buy these by the case (of 60) and give them away -- we gave one to everyone who came to our special pre-showing of "An Inconvenient Truth," for example. I think I've given away a total of 240 of these.
It's a good fast read, and a pretty fair summary/intro for those who will not read a long book on peak oil, or a more technical tome.

