United States - May 11
by Staff
Click on the headline (link) for the full text. Many more articles are available through the Energy Bulletin homepage
Over the last eight months, the Department of Energy purchased more than 10 million barrels of oil for the SPR as the price rose $40 to above $120. This is not sensible. It puts upward pressure on oil prices at the worst possible time. It is a waste of taxpayer money. It gives aid and comfort to unfriendly nations. And it is an insurance policy that, for the most part, is no longer needed. In fact, we should be selling oil from the SPR at $120. Doing so could be a powerful tool for U.S. energy policy. ... The blunt fact is that the price of crude oil on global markets is controlled by this cartel of governments [OPEC]. Mr. Anderson is chief investment officer and chief economist at LPL Financial in Boston, Mass.
Next week, Renewable Energy Vermont explores how to make Vermont's electricity and heating fuel sectors more resilient. Their second annual Distributed Energy Conference, with the theme "Building Resilient Communities," takes place in Stratton on Thursday. Their interesting choice of keynote speaker, John Robb, illustrates the connection of resiliency to national and local security. Robb, a former Air Force pilot, studies counter-terrorism, and his first book examines how small groups of 21st century terrorists can damage much larger organizations by targeting critical infrastructure like oil pipelines. He is working on a new book about how resilient communities can, through their very design, withstand such attacks. It turns out that those same design properties also can buffer the communities against energy and food shortages, whether they are caused by resource depletion or sabotage. ... John Robb expands on the Lovins' work to picture a resilient community that can "survive an extended disconnection from the global grid" in many areas, including energy, food, communications and transportation. For electricity, for example, he promotes "micro-grids." They are tied into the continental electrical grid, but they are designed to be disconnected and supplied with local power when there is a large-scale blackout like the Northeast blackout of Aug. 14, 2003, that left 50 million North Americans in the dark. ... Community resilience and national security are connected not only domestically, but also internationally. In his new book, "Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet," Michael Klare describes a "new international energy order." Klare, director of Peace and World Security Studies at Hampshire College, argues that Russia has become a superpower once more, due to its abundant energy sources. I interviewed him on Equal Time Radio on WDEV Wednesday, and this is how he described our security situation: "In an era of energy scarcity, which we're in today, those few countries that are 'energy surplus powers' are extraordinarily privileged in the world power system, and countries like the United States and the European countries are in an inferior status. We don't have enough energy to meet our needs, so we're dependent on the handful of countries that are wealthy in resources. The country that's wealthiest in the world in resources is Russia. Russia has the fourth or fifth largest supply of oil, but it's No. 1 by far in natural gas. Because oil is likely to disappear in another decade or two, natural gas will then be the No. 1 source of energy, and Russia has by far the largest supply of natural gas. It also has lots of coal and uranium. Vladimir Putin grasped this essential reality 10 years ago and was determined to use this inherent power to restore Russia's role as a superpower. He understood that in this century, energy would be the source of power, in the way that nuclear weapons were in the previous century."
During today's OnPoint, Dan Lashof, science director of the climate center at the Natural Resources Defense Council, discusses a new report that analyzes carbon allocation scenarios and their varying financial effects on power companies and consumers. The report, cosponsored by Ceres, outlines how the Lieberman-Warner bill's allowance approach could help offset electricity rate increases. Lashof also discusses how lawmakers should be using the example provided by the European Union's emissions trading scheme when developing carbon allocation scenarios for the United States.
|
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.







