Climate policy - May 22
by Staff
Click on the headline (link) for the full text. Many more articles are available through the Energy Bulletin homepage
When we realize that our survival is at stake, business as usual no longer applies. Familiar analogies include times of war when factories shifted from producing unnecessary consumer goods to what is needed to feed, clothe and arm troops. During these times, civilians accept sacrifice and social cohesion is high because the shared threat is understood. In our current situation, we need to adopt an emergency mode of conduct in politics, business and civic life that achieves the survival goal of sustainability. While our task is daunting, today’s interview will show that it is still possible to stabilize the climate.
Bernaditas Muller, the coordinator for the G77 and China group of countries in key climate change negotiations told the Guardian she was "surprised and concerned" that Britain was not pressing for billions of dollars of proposed climate aid funds to go through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), the legally binding global agreement signed by more than 180 countries. It is expected that $5-10bn of aid will be pledged by G8 countries in July for poor countries to address climate change. Speaking in a personal capacity, Muller said she feared this would dwarf UN funds and divert money from the UNFCC. Britain is currently trying to persuade other G8 countries to contribute to climate adaptation funds, which would be administered by the World Bank. It has pledged £800m and argues that the bank has consulted widely and amended its proposals to take account of developing countries' needs. But Muller said that going through the World Bank would be divisive. "The bank has a very mixed reputation among developing countries. ..."
(For details follow www.bbcworld.com/Pages/ProgrammeFeature.aspx?id=196&FeatureID=753) When asked about sustainability reporting she cited the Government’s mandated reporting (starting this year) from public companies as an example of the government’s investment in sustainable development. She also cited Sweden’s carbon dioxide taxes on petrol and diesel. From this year, about 38% of what the motorist pays for petrol goes to energy and carbon dioxide tax respectively. Two good things on the face of it that should be putting Sweden on the road to reduced fossil fuel dependency. Maud Olofsson even managed to add that although mandating sustainability reporting from public companies, the government mandates these companies are run at a profit. With a hint of pride in her voice she made it clear that Sweden could combine economic growth and responsible business. Not quite true. What Maud omitted was, that in demanding profits from state companies they are putting profits before promoting sustainable development of Sweden. Two glaring examples: the state run airports authority, whilst touting its environmental program on one hand, is planning to increase air travel and thereby emissions over the next few years. Another example comes from the state owned railway. Finding it hard to keep profits up in the face of meagre investment in new tracks and rolling stock, they are now putting up their prices. The increases are expected to result in customers flying more and driving their cars more. ... despite all ranting about sustainability reporting, hard facts about activities that are putting Sweden on the route to sustainability are hard to find. With one of the world’s highest per capita carbon dioxide emissions, and with Sweden being the country in Europe most dependent on the motor vehicle industry, how long will it take before the Swedes themselves wake up to the fact that for every day that passes, they are increasingly at risk that coming fossil fuel scarcity will cause more than just economic damage.
Boston, MA - David Doniger, Policy Director, Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC); Ralph Izzo, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, PSEG; Jim Rogers, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Duke Energy |
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.







