Peak oil - Nov 15
by Staff
Click on the headline (link) for the full text. Many more articles are available through the Energy Bulletin homepage
Should the deans of the peak-oil movement give the world a break and shelve their dire warnings of impending supply shortages? So urges Robert Hirsch, one of the true eminences of the peakist crowd. Hirsch penned a seminal 2005 report for the Energy Department called “Peaking of World Oil Production” that warned of stark consequences as world oil supplies tighten, slamming the world economy. He has since lectured widely on the topic. But with the world economy now under seige for quite different reasons, Hirsch is urging his cohorts to tone down their bleakness for a while so as not to worsen the damage. In a memo “To The Peak Oil Community,” Hirsch recommends that the group “minimize its effort to awaken the world to the near-term dangers of world oil supply.” His rationale is itself plenty grim. “If the realization of peak oil along with its disastrous financial implications was added to the existing mix of troubles, the added trauma could be unthinkable,” he wrote to his colleagues. Hirsch sent his memo to a Who’s Who of the peak movement, including retired petroleum geologist Colin Campbell; investment banker Matt Simmons; Swedish peak-oil scholar Kjell Aleklett; and Steve Andrews, director of the U.S. Association for the Study of Peak Oil. But his appeal, sent Thursday, doesn’t seem to be winning much support. ... Here’s the memo in full: TO THE PEAK OIL COMMUNITY: (14 November 2008) Mr. Hirsch has a good point. It's counter-productive to contribute to a mood of panic. This would be a good time to turn down the "doomerosity" knob. And yet... An awareness of peak oil is more important now than ever before. Governments are expected to boost spending in a Keynsian attempt to keep the economy going. If we are aware of energy limitations, we would spend to promote renewable energy and improve efficiency (e.g. rail and mass transit). If we continue with business as usual, we will spend money on projects that make our situation worse (cars, airports and freeways). Mr. Hirsch operates at the level of government and industry, so he may be unaware of peak oil work at the individual and community level. Individuals have championed home gardening, prudent spending, and living a satisfying life without the need for the energy-intensive consumerism (See Sharon Astyk's writings). Groups like Transition Towns and Post Carbon Institute have promoted the idea of resilient communities. These efforts are just as applicable to an economic downturn as to peak oil. Many in the peak oil community have gone through the stages of denial and trauma that the general populace are undergoing. We have ideas and positive mental attitudes about dealing with the future. So why not take advantage of it? -BA UPDATE (Nov 15) Martin Payne, an EB contributor and upstream oil and gas professional, writes: From the Marketwatch article, which appeared on November 12, 2008, which had the subheading,* *"*The International Energy Agency on Wednesday dismissed fears about peak oil, but the group said under-investment could lead to production troubles.*": "But it warned that OPEC countries will need to step up their investment campaign. Some 64 million barrels of oil equivalent a day of additional gross capacity, the equivalent of six times the amount Saudi Arabia produces today, must be brought on stream from 2007 to 2030, with about half needed by 2015." I believe Tom Whipple got it correctly. The IEA was very clever in their wording. The answer is there, but it is hidden to some, or there is sufficient material present for use in obfuscation, if desired. Perhaps Dr. Hirsch is saying the same thing; namely, the answer is there; let it be, this is the only way to get this information out and not create a whole new crisis or exacerbate the one we are in. I agree with your comments - the solutions for dealing with tough economic times intersect with those for dealing with "Peak Oil". Also, as you mentioned, given the reality of Peak Oil, we should direct our "macro" efforts (and the coming "jobs" program) towards stimulating private enterprise to operate on the right kind of infrastructure - mass transit retrofits, conservation efforts, rail improvements and CNG/LNG stations. Hence, my article a while back, "Fix energy, fix the economy."
It turns out all three men have, to varying degrees, allied themselves with a “peak oil” theory once dismissed as a crackpot concept lurking in the darkened corners of the Internet. But in the last few years, with oil skyrocketing to over $140 a barrel in July before free falling to below $60 at press time, the theory has attracted plenty of followers who predict disastrous consequences for all humankind if governments around the world do not drastically change their energy policies.
When Stephen and Rebekah Hren learned about Peak Oil, they geared up for the apocalypse. "Like most people do when they understand the gravity of the situation," Stephen says, "we had a Peak Oil freak out." They bought 10 acres of farmland about 30 miles north of Durham, built an off-the-grid house with solar power and passive solar heating—a "hideout," Stephen calls it now—and waited for the end to come. And waited, and waited. "After two years we thought, 'Maybe this isn't such a good thing,'" Rebekah remembers. "We're way out in the middle of nowhere and gas is going to get more and more expensive. It became obvious to us that we couldn't really feed ourselves if it came right down to it. We were always going to need support from a community, and we were in no kind of a community at all." This epiphany was the impetus for the founding of NC Powerdown (www.meetup.com/NCPowerdown), a group that meets about once a month to discuss the transition to a post-oil economy in the context of community activism and shared resources. Rebekah explains the thinking behind the group: "NC Powerdown can do a couple of things. It can publicize peak oil, and it can also be a skill-sharing group and a resource base for people with ideas about how to transition to a lower fuel economy and lifestyle." "A lot of people at NC Powerdown had the same thought we had: 'Oh, I need to get my acres and grow all my own food," Stephen adds. "We were passing them the other way and saying 'No, no, no, don't do that.' There's no way to get through this transition to lower oil supplies without having a community network—a support network." And so, as they recount in their recent book, The Carbon-Free Home, the Hrens decided they needed to move back to a city. They sold their country hideout and moved to Durham, citing its transportation, community and culture as pluses for the low-energy, environmentally friendly lifestyle. They bought an older 1930s home on Trinity Avenue to retrofit and refurbish, possessing the necessary carpentry and electrician skills to do much of the work themselves.
Hi all, After much delay (damn, I've been busy lately!) we've managed to get the Energy Beyond Oil Presentation slides and background information on-line. You can download PDF versions (plain and one with explanatory text/links) or click-through the pages and see the information/links that accompanies each slide: First presented in June 2002 (wow, those were the days when it was fun to talk about peak oil) as part of a Free Range Network weekend workshop on energy (its first public outing was in October 2002), the 2-hour 'Energy Beyond Oil' (EBO) presentation is the basic, beginner's guide to the issues of energy consumption in the UK, climate change and and peak oil. Structured as a 2-hour long visual presentation and discussion, the event outlines the scale and complexity of the issues we face, within the UK, as the human species reaches the limits of the Earth's environment. Probably around Christmas we're also going to add an audio commentary for each slide too! Hopefully the 'Less is a Four Letter Word' presentation (partially on-line now) will receive a similar treatment in the next few weeks, and the 'Energy and Food' talk by Mid-December. Also, all the recently updated information sheets are now back on-line too: Enjoy! P.
... Have you written science fiction before? I started writing science fiction about a year and a half ago. ... I was writing more contemporary fiction, and it stressed me out. And I thought, "Hey, I'll write a science fiction book and that will be more fun." And now, I take it just as seriously as I took writing contemporary fiction. I guess what intrigues me about it is that it's not often used to really look at problems with the world. In (futuristic stories), there's always some great techno fix or a world where there's unlimited energy, and nobody really talks about how that happens. Nobody is really addressing problems like global warming, (declining) oil — or not many people are, anyway. Those kinds of issues are much more interesting to me than warp drive or anything like that. It's a way to really look at problems that have to be dealt with on a cultural level but also on an infrastructure level — problems that are really difficult to deal with. What were the problems you wanted to explore in this story? The story takes place in the future where it's post-peak oil. It's a post-finance economy. It's a place where there's horrible disparity between classes and people are just making do with what they have, and it's very difficult. It's just a way of saying, "Hey, these things that we're taking for granted aren't things that we really should be taking for granted." These are things that we really have to address, and if we don't, it's going to be hard. It's such a sad, bleak scenario. Do you think something like this might really be in store for us? I hope not, and I don't think so. People are adaptable. We'll probably start making the right choices when we start feeling the right kinds of pressure. When gas hits $10 per gallon. When it costs $12 to buy a California avocado. When we start importing all our wheat and corn from Canada. When there's no more skiing anywhere south of Montana. We'll figure it out, hopefully in time. |
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.







