Peak oil review - Dec 15
by Tom Whipple
1. Prices and productionIt was yet another volatile week with oil prices swinging wildly in reaction to the latest news. At week’s end oil settled at $46.28. Bad economic news, the ups and downs of the Detroit bailout, the massive Obama stimulus proposal, Saudi confirmation that it is producing at quota, and prospects for another OPEC production cut all contributed to the swings. The IEA released a new estimate that worldwide demand for 2008 will decline by 0.2 million b/d to 85.8 million b/d, the first drop in 25 years. Much of the decrease in demand comes from the US where the EIA now estimates that US consumption for this year will be down by 1.2 million b/d or nearly 6 percent. US demand for gasoline in 2008 dropped 3.4 percent, for distillates 5.7 percent and for jet fuel 6.3 percent. For 2009 the IEA, while revising its forecast down by 350,000 b/d, still forecasts that consumption will increase again to 86.3 million barrels. The Agency notes, however, that this increase could disappear if the economic slump deepens. Not all analysts are so optimistic about the demand for oil 2009 as the IEA. The World Bank issued a very pessimistic report forecasting that global demand for oil will collapse next year as the commodities boom has come to an end. Even more pessimistic is oil market analyst Philip Verleger, who believes that oil demand is dropping much faster than is being reported and may now be in the vicinity of 82 million b/d or a 5 million b/d drop over last December. If these numbers are anywhere near true, it implies that OPEC will need to cut production on the order of 6 or 7 million b/d to bring the markets into balance. The world’s investment banks continue to issue pessimistic forecasts for prices and the economy. Goldman’s foresees oil at $30 a barrel early next year. Deutsche Bank forecasts global GDP growth to be zero next year and forecasts that oil will average $47. 2. The December 17th OPEC meetingThe tone for the OPEC meeting was set by Saudi Arabia last week when Oil Minister al-Naimi, in a highly unusual announcement, said that in November the kingdom produced 8.493 million b/d, very close to at its OPEC quota of 8.477 million. The announcement was made to counter a new IEA estimate that Saudi production for November had been 287,000 b/d above quota and sent a message that Riyadh expected other OPEC members to comply too. For two weeks now, OPEC President Chakib Khelil has been telling the press that the decisions had already been made and to expect a “surprise” production cut at the Oran meeting on Wednesday. As the conventional wisdom had been that the production cut would be 1.5 million, the new formulation suggests that the cut will have be 2 million b/d or higher to be a surprise and 3 million b/d or more to be a market-moving real surprise. The question of compliance to an OPEC production cut is more complicated than usual. Heretofore the more fiscally strapped members of OPEC, most notably Venezuela and Iran, made token cuts and ignored their official quotas. This time the situation may be different. With the deepest economic recession in decades getting worse, oil prices plunging, and the world watching, some OPEC members may conclude that quota-cheating at the expense of fellow cartel members may no longer be the best policy option. Should oil prices fall much further, and numbers like $30 and even $20 a barrel are being thrown around, and the economic recession be prolonged, no amount of quota cheating is going to soften the impact. It will be a question of hanging together or hanging separately. The issue of Russia joining OPEC or making parallel production cuts has been much in the news for the past week. The Moscow Times reported that President Medvedev had indicated for the first time that Russia was ready to join the cartel. While it appears that Moscow will send a senior delegation to the Oran meeting, many are skeptical that the Russians will make more than token cuts. As Russia is now the world’s largest producer, pumping about 9.8 million b/d, it is clearly in a position to make a large cut, but recent reporting suggests that Moscow may be backing off the idea of joining OPEC or at least joining in with a substantial production cut. 3. Obama’s energy teamLater today President-elect Obama will introduce the team that will lead the development and implementation of the country’s energy and environmental policies for the next four years. The names released so far indicate that major shifts in US environmental and energy leadership are in the offing. The senior White House coordinator of energy and environmental policy will be Carol Browner, who ran the EPA during the Clinton administration. Lisa Jackson, who was New Jersey’s top environmental officer, will run the EPA. Nancy Sutley, who has the top environmental job in Los Angles, will head the White House Council on Environmental Policy. The most interesting pick is Steven Chu, the Nobel-winning Director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and one of the country’s leading advocates for reducing emissions and for the development of sustainable forms of energy. While at LBNL he redirected much of the lab’s efforts towards working on energy and environmental problems. The New York Times has already editorialized that “he has a sophisticated grasp of the complexities of global warming and a strong belief in fighting it aggressively.” While the scope of Browner’s White House job is still under discussion, it is expected that she would coordinate administration policies across departmental lines and be the chief advocate for energy and environmental legislation. The position is already being called the “Energy Czar.” Thus far, the prospective appointments have been well received in many parts of the political spectrum with the League of Conservation Voters calling the group a “green dream team.” The oil industry will likely be unhappy with the proposed team, based on recent comments. 4. AutomobilesLast week’s news was headlined by efforts in Congress to provide temporary aid to Detroit until the new Congress and the Obama administration are ready to grapple with long term industry restructuring. The failure to reach an agreement in Congress last week led to the Bush administration reversing course and apparently agreeing to release enough TARP money to keep GM and Chrysler solvent for the next few months. Washington is not alone with this problem. Automobile manufacturers in Europe and Asia are having similar problems and are appealing to their governments for support. Although the problems might not be as serious as those of Detroit, no government wants to see such an important segment of its economy as the automobile industry fail. All governments want to bring a new generation of fuel efficient, low emission vehicles into production as soon as possible. At the minute these goals are very much in air. As we have seen in the Congressional debate last week, there is much concern that the industry, whose sales are fast approaching 50 percent of recent highs, will require massive subsidies to keep the industry viable long enough to achieve the needed reforms. Whether these massive subsidies are deemed worthwhile and affordable is one of the key questions facing the US and many other governments around the world. 5. Briefs (clips from recent Peak Oil News dailies are indicated by date and item #)
Quotes of the Week
-- Richard Heinberg, author and fellow with the Post Carbon Institute Original article available here |
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.







