Peak Oil Review - Jan 12
by Tom Whipple
1. The volatility continues It was another week of fighting in Gaza, OPEC production cuts, and the gas shutoff to Europe competing with an avalanche of bad economic news for control of oil prices. At the end, the bad economic news won with crude falling below $40 on Friday after having been above $50 on Tuesday. The week was highlighted by a 12 percent price drop on Wednesday, the biggest in seven years. While US stockpiles continue to build, oil for November 2009 delivery is still trading at $17 a barrel over the front month. So long as there is surplus oil on the market, speculators will continue to buy oil and store it for future delivery. Inventories at Cushing, Okla, the largest US commercial storage hub, are at a record high and there are reports that an additional 10 supertankers have been chartered to store oil until fall. US refining operations remain at a relatively low level with imports of gasoline making up the difference. Despite the deteriorating economy, US demand for petroleum products continued to creep up due to low prices and is now only about 500,000 b/d lower than during the previous 4 week period last year. Gasoline demand is only down by 200,000 b/d; however some of the rebound is likely due to the holiday season. As oil traders are now chartering relatively expensive supertankers to hold the excess oil for later delivery, it is clear that there is an oversupply of crude at present. Last week US crude inventories built at the rate of nearly 1 million b/d as speculators took advantage of current prices to fill every available tank. Governments with strategic reserves are starting to purchase crude. The US is adding 180,000 b/d to its reserve and China is reported to have started purchases too. The size of the demand for crude and whether it is contracting due to deteriorating economic conditions or increasing once again due to relatively low prices will be the key issue during the next few months. Now that OPEC appears willing to be making actual production cuts, price action over the next few months should give a better insight into the state of worldwide demand. 2. Gaza A call by an Iranian military commander to cut oil exports to Israel’s supporters last week made little headway with conservative Arab governments who are completely focused on dealing with the plunge in world oil prices. Iran’s Foreign Ministry paid only lip service to the call for an embargo. For Iran to go it alone in the midst of efforts to slash domestic oil subsidies could easily prove disastrous. The last thing any Arab oil exporter wants to do right now is to slash revenues still further by attempting to embargo crude shipments to perceived allies of Israel. When the word reached the oil markets that the Saudi’s were not going to respond to the call for an embargo, prices fell and the Gaza fighting was written off as a factor for the time being. Later in the week both sides rejected UN calls for a ceasefire. Despite the tightening Israeli noose around Gaza City, Hamas was still able to fire a diminishing number of rockets into Israel. Both sides are determined not to be seen as losing the confrontation. For Hamas this means reopening the borders and for Israel the end of rocket attacks and the flow of military supplies to Hamas. In the unequal military contest, Gaza civilians are losing heavily, with the number of Palestinian deaths approaching 1000, while at last report the Israelis have only lost 13. As long as the fighting continues, Hamas will continue to gain political support around the world and the hostility in the streets towards the West and the policy of moderate Arab regimes will continue to grow. For the time being, low oil prices likely will deter use of the oil weapon in support of the Palestinian cause. However, once oil revenues return to the levels of last summer or higher, the oil weapon could again become an important factor in the Arab-Israeli situation. 3. OPEC cuts production The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries said on December 17th that it would reduce its output target to 24.845 million barrels a day, a 4.2 million b/d cut from September production. At the time there was wide-spread skepticism among oil traders that OPEC would ever unite sufficiently to carry out a program of major production cuts. In the last two weeks, nearly every member of OPEC has announced its intentions to comply with their production targets. In several cases OPEC members have released details of which fields and companies will be cutting production. Senior OPEC officials have said that it is likely that the cartel will make the promised cuts. Even the National Iranian Oil Company, which normally is very reticent to talk about its production, has announced that it will be cutting supplies under some long-term contracts by 14 percent. Venezuela will be reducing its shipments to two US refineries and said it will be cutting production by 189,000 b/d. Caracas has already made cuts of 46,000 b/d and 129,000 b/d as agreed in the September and October meetings so that the total cut since September will be 364,000 b/d. The Saudis are now saying that they will cut their February production to 7.7 million b/d which is 300,000 b/d below quota. Refiners in Asia say they have been notified by the Saudis that their shipments in February will be 10 percent lower than called for in long-term contracts. Nigeria announced that it plans to export 1.66 million b/d in February down 12 percent from December. The situation there is always confused because of delays and disruptions caused by insurgent attacks, but it appears that Nigeria will be cutting 320,000 b/d from September levels. In Ecuador, the government has announced that the Italian and French oil companies operating there will be cutting production 40,000 b/d in line with the new target. If all these announcements are to be believed, there would seem to be widespread compliance with the cuts from the September, October and December meetings so that production in a next two or three months will actually be 4 million b/d or more lower than last fall. At that point oil prices will either be moving back up or world demand has fallen much further than is generally acknowledged. 4. Briefs (clips from recent Peak Oil News dailies are indicated by date and item #)
Quote of the Week Original article available here |
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.







