No "hope" in Copenhagen? - Dec 18
by Staff
Click on the headline (link) for the full text. Many more articles are available through the Energy Bulletin homepage
President Obama told delegates that the international community's ability to take collective action was in doubt. But neither the US, the EU or China offered anything new as fears grew that a deal may be slipping away. There was confusion among delegates as several draft negotiating texts circulated on Friday afternoon. A draft political agreement drawn up by a small group of countries was rejected during overnight discussions...
Granted, he met beforehand with a score of world leaders, and a dozen more at lunch—not to mention an hour-long one-on-one with the Chinese premier in between—but his speech left plenty of frustration inside Copenhagen’s Bella Center and without. Here’s a smattering of reactions to the speech: The Guardian (U.K.): “In the absence of any evidence of that commitment the words rang hollow and there was a palpable sense of disappointment in the audience [...] The lacklustre speech proved a huge frustration to a summit that had been looking to Obama to use his stature on the world stage – and his special following among African leaders – to try to come to an ambitious deal.” The BBC (U.K.): “Around the Bella Center, delegates huddled around TV monitors listening with rapt attention - some, doubtless, hoping that the president would bring a rabbit out of a hat, a conjuror sprinkling some magic dust to create a fairytale deal out of what is at the moment a bottomless morass of texts and tensions. Reactions were mixed…”...
"The Secretary-General of the United Nations (Ban Ki-moon) has asked people not to leave tonight," he said. But he remained confident that leaders would eventually reach a deal. "I cannot imagine 120 leaders going back to their countries with empty hands. Everyone expressed commitment to fight climate change. OK, do it," he said. Despite an upbeat speech by President Barack Obama, urging the world to take action on climate change, there are still huge difference between rich and poor countries. A leaked document shows that there is still no agreement on a numerical target for rich countries to cut emissions. The document, believed to be a draft agreement for a political declaration, has also watered down any commitment to limiting global warming to a pledge that the world “ought not to exceed 2C (3.6F)"...
Last-ditch efforts by the UN to get the 120 world leaders to at least commit to hold temperatures to a maximum rise of 2C in the next century were failing, as a series of draft political agreement — each weaker than the last — were circulated among countries. Versions of the overarching political text seen by the Guardian showed that profound disagreements between countries had not been resolved. Only weak, long-term aspirations for an overall global emissions cut of 50% by 2050 and an 80% cut by 2050 for rich countries. These commitments, and the 2C pledge, were assumed to be givens in any deal. As the draft text reached its sixth version, there were some glimmers of hope, as some nations put more encouraging language into the agreement, including a reference to a limit of 1.5C being supported by the science. But more versions are expected. Observers said that all numbers and target dates were likely to change over the night as further draft texts were issued, but that the two most serious stumbling blocks were demands from rich countries that developing country should peak their emissions within a few years, and the Kyoto protocol should be abandoned before a new legal treaty was in place. ...Hopes that Barack Obama would deploy his authority as the leader of the world's largest economy — and his personal political charisma — to try to broker a last-minute deal were also frustrated. A visibly angry Obama told world leaders that it was past time for them to come to an agreement. "The time for talk is over," he said...
Barack Obama’s honeymoon with both the environmental community and greater Europe has come to a end. At Øksnehallen hall in Copenhagen, loud boos fill the room. Hundreds of NGO representatives and media members have responded to a live telecast of the President’s utterly disappointing speech with loudly derisive grunts moans and hisses. Obama, who descended from the sky in Air Force One a few hours ago to a Copenhagen largely cleared of the nonprofit ‘riff raff’ (in an effort to stifle calls for meaningful progress, access to the proceedings was reduced from 15,000 to just 90 in advance of his arrival), by now must be feeling that his attempt to play the role of white knight has failed. We’ll meet our aggressive reduction goals of 17% by 2020. Boos. The United States is serious about addressing climate change. Hisses. Obama’s delivery was flat, uninspired. Given the chance to ignite the world at what is arguably the most significant moment in history, the man mailed it in. Perhaps he’s over used to talking to his fellow Americans, whose languorous tongues swallow pills and lies with ease. The Europeans here are better informed and saw through his overlong delivery as uninspired rhetoric. The boo birds flutter toward their laptops, readying reports of the U.S. President’s latest failure to step up. As the world watched, Obama’s well-tailored suit jacket and blue tie vanished into thin air. I’ll buy the man a poncho in Mexico City (COP16) next year.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu puts it like this: "We are facing impending disaster on a monstrous scale … A global goal of about 2C is to condemn Africa to incineration and no modern development." And yet that is precisely what Ethiopia's prime minister, Meles Zenawi, proposed to do when he stopped off in Paris on his way to Copenhagen: standing with President Nicolas Sarkozy, and claiming to speak on behalf of all of Africa (he is the head of the African climate-negotiating group), he unveiled a plan that includes the dreaded 2C increase and offers developing countries just $10bn a year to help pay for everything climate related, from sea walls to malaria treatment to fighting deforestation. It's hard to believe this is the same man who only three months ago was saying this: "We will use our numbers to delegitimise any agreement that is not consistent with our minimal position … If need be, we are prepared to walk out of any negotiations that threaten to be another rape of our continent … What we are not prepared to live with is global warming above the minimum avoidable level."And this: "We will participate in the upcoming negotiations not as supplicants pleading for our case but as negotiators defending our views and interests."... Editorial NotesThe lack of commitment to a binding legal agreement in Copenhagen is inexcusable; a watered down one might save face but be useless. Obama is set the task of turning the ship of state full about after years of denial of the issue by the Bush administration. Change is going to take courageous and inspirational leadership, not lowest common denominator compromise -KS/SO |
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.







