Producers - Apr 27
by Staff
Click on the headline (link) for the full text. Many more articles are available through the Energy Bulletin homepage
Latest: Saturday morning and I wandered up to my local gasoline station to take some pictures of the chaos. There was no chaos. No queues. No restrictions - yet. But with about half of UK oil and gas production closing down, who if anyone is to blame for this debacle? Ineos? The workers? The government? BP? Media indifference? I will be back with an analysis of systemic failure of the UK. ... Grangemouth lies at the end of the Forties oil pipeline system that gathers oil (and liquids) from oil and gas fields throughout a large area of the Central North Sea. Whilst Grangemouth processes around 200,000 bpd the pipeline system handles around 700,000 bpd and according to this CNN report, a BP spokesman has said they may have to shut down the whole pipeline system. With the global oil market and European gas market already stretched, the impact of this dispute may reverberate around the world. Why Grangemouth is important Grangemouth is much more that an oil refinery. Originally operated by BP, Grangemouth became an integral part of the Forties oil production, transportation, refining and export system. BP has since sold the Forties oil field to Apache corporation and the refinery to Ineos but it still operates the pipeline and a number of the oil and gas fields that feed into it. The difference between this and the Fuel Price Protests of September 2000 is that were as then we did not shortage of the product, only logistical problems, this time were are going to be faced with a product shortage. The longer the shortage goes on, the bigger the problem. Question: It is anticipated that the Grangemouth strikers will return to work after 48 hours. So how long to restart the plant and what if the workers decide to have another strike, may be in two weeks time.
On Friday, after days of talks between party moderates and self-described "radicals," the PRD ended a two-week blockade of Congress that had prevented discussion of Calderon's proposed changes. Legislators from the PRD and two smaller leftist parties had shut down both houses on April 10 by taking over the daises in both. The PRD's Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador called it an act of civil disobedience to defend the state-owned oil giant Pemex from what he says is a bid to privatize it. But some PRD leaders had opposed the blockade. And by Friday, leaders from across the political spectrum had made it clear that they wanted an end to the standoff.
To a surprising degree, these changes reflect global changes in the natural gas business. Historically, natural gas has been a regional business, and North America continues to be somewhat isolated from gas developments elsewhere in the world. According to CEO Robin Mann of AJM Petroleum Consultants, North American markets are presently somewhat isolated from the situation. However, he has no doubt that “gas is becoming a global commodity. Whether we like it or not, we are going to be caught up in it” - and, probably, sooner than you think. The globalization of the world’s natural gas industry is being driven by a combination of economic and geopolitical forces. For example, consider the world’s second-largest gas-consuming region, Europe. ... Europe’s mad scramble is one driver behind the globalization of gas. Another is rapidly growing gas demand in the developing world - another trend with geopolitical overtones. The author of a best-selling book (A Thousand Barrels per Second) recently issued in Japanese and Chinese translations, ARC Financial’s Peter Tertzakian used China to illustrate the shift. Coal and oil have played themselves out as easily harnessed and accessible fuels in that country, he says, and the country has to diversify into other fuels. “China’s pattern of energy usage is following the pattern of all other already industrialized countries. First you dam up all your rivers, then you move on to coal, then you start using oil as a booster rocket for the economy. Once you’ve done that, increasing your use of those fuels becomes unsustainable and you have to make a rapid shift to alternative energies - and the alternatives for China and other industrializing countries are natural gas and nuclear energy.” This article appears in the May issue of Oilweek |
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.







