Peak oil review - January 30
by Tom Whipple
1. Oil and the Global Economy Natural gas futures, which had been trading above $4 per million BTUs in November, fell to below $2.30 per million last Monday as warm weather and over-production in the US continued. After Chesapeake Energy and other producers announced that they were making substantial cuts in their drilling programs in the coming year, futures rebounded sharply, closing out the week at $2.67 per million. The now familiar crises of the Iranian confrontation, the EU’s sovereign debt, employment, interest rates, economic growth and the Syrian uprising continued to make news, pulling the markets one way and then the other. In addition to the world’s multiple mega-crises, numerous smaller situations that will impact the availability of oil continued to fester. Bombs continued to go off amid increasingly unstable political and social situations in Iraq and Nigeria suggesting to some observers that civil wars in one or both of these countries might not be far away. South Sudan shut-in some 350,000 b/d of oil production claiming that Sudan was stealing its oil as it was being exported to customers. Although Libyan oil is reported to be back to 80 percent of pre-uprising production, the political situation is still highly unstable with clashes between various militia groups starting to occur. In the US, “Election 2012” moved ahead with President Obama devoting a substantial portion of this year’s State of the Union address to energy policy and his various political opponents denouncing his positions. With higher, and possibly much higher, gasoline prices in store for the next few months, energy policy could easily come to dominate the political discourse this year. 2. The Iranian Confrontation Tehran’s response to the EU’s announcement has taken two tracks. One was to call for renewed negotiations over its nuclear program and an IAEA team is now in Tehran to explore whether the Iranians are genuinely seeking a solution to the crisis or, as many believe, are simply seeking to buy more time to develop nuclear weapons. The second and more risky track for Tehran was the announcement that it could halt oil sales to Europe as early as this week, thereby preempting the EU’s embargo and depriving Italy, Greece, and Spain of five months’ time to line up other sources of oil. Over the weekend mixed signals came from senior Iranian officials. While debate on a bill to halt oil sales to the EU was postponed, a senior Iranian official said oil exports to the EU would be “stopped soon.” Another official warned that the IEA inspection team had better act “professionally” or suffer the consequences. Should the negotiation track fail once again, the situation gets murkier. The Iranians are saying that stopping the 600,000 b/d that it currently sells to Europe will drive world oil prices to $150 a barrel and thereby do more harm to the EU’s economies than to Iran as Tehran will benefit from the price increase. However, Libyan oil production is recovering nicely and Saudi production is at a recent high, so that the loss of Iran’s exports may not hurt the EU as much as Tehran portrays. Whether Tehran would be able sell the 600,000 b/d to Asia, possibly at cut rate prices, or be forced to load them onto floating storage for a while remains open. Should Beijing be tempted to fill its strategic reserve cheaply with Iranian oil while the rest of the world suffers from high oil prices is an open question. It is clear that China does not want to become dependent on Iran as its major source of Middle Eastern oil and has much to lose from this confrontation. There are numerous sub-plots to the embargo story. Some of the oil Iran ships to Europe is coming in repayment for investments that Italy, which is still owed $1.5 billion, has made in Iran. Tehran is threatening to cancel these contracts. It also seems that 95 percent of the world’s oil shipments are insured by EU companies and insurance pools subject to the sanctions. Without proper insurance many tanker owners and destination ports would be reluctant to accept Iranian oil shipments. Although a handful of Iranian politicians continue to talk about closing the Straits of Hormuz in retaliation for the EU’s embargo, the realization that Iran would be a clear loser in any military confrontation with the West is reducing such talk. The situation remains volatile but for now the ball is in Tehran’s court. The solution to the problem most frequently mentioned is to allow the Iranians to develop their nuclear technology under strict supervision to the point where they could in theory quickly build and deploy nuclear weapons without actually doing so. Whether this solution would be acceptable to those countries who would feel most threatened by a nuclear armed Iran remains to be seen. 3. The Euro Crisis Whether the Greeks are willing to accept such a surrender of their national sovereignty to remain in the EU is an open question, as is whether the rest of the EU is willing to sign off on the new agreement and hand over yet another bailout to the Greeks. Many observers are skeptical that the new proposal will be ratified. They believe that the only solution is for Greece to be cut loose from the Eurozone while efforts are made to protect the remaining members. 4. Refining petroleum As in the US, European refiners are coping with overcapacity, weak demand, and tight credit. Two weeks ago Petroplus announced that it was going into bankruptcy and would shut its five refineries located in the UK, Belgium, France, Germany, and Switzerland. Three of those have already been shut down and the outlook for another is precarious. The prospects for EU refining in the wake of the Iranian oil embargo is also raising concerns. The fear is that Iran will dump its oil production on Asian refiners at cut-rate prices, where it will be refined and shipped back to Europe in a position to undercut local refiners. The Eastern US has long benefited from refining overcapacity in Europe as refiners there could profitably ship to the US gasoline that they were unable to dispose of locally. Any reduction in EU refining capacity is likely to be felt in the form of higher prices along the US’s eastern seaboard. The outlook already is for higher prices along the East Coast. While retail prices have not kept up with the recent gasoline price increases in the futures markets – up by over 40 cents a gallon in the last six weeks as compared to a 15 cent increase at the pump – it is only a matter of time. Gasoline prices in relatively high-tax New York and Connecticut are now only 2 cents a gallon below those in California, the traditional price leader in the lower 48. Gasoline prices in the Washington DC area, where the political impact is likely to be the greatest, are not far behind. Given that it is only January and that we still have four or five months of traditional spring price increases to go before the 2012 peak is reached, this year is giving every indication of shaping up to be a record breaker for gasoline prices. Given that it is a presidential election year, and considering what we saw in Washington during the 2008 gasoline price spike, we can expect the political theater, histrionics, and finger pointing to begin any day now. Quote of the week The Briefs (clips from recent Peak Oil News dailies are indicated by date and item #)
Original article available here |
The Conversation
“But communication is two-sided - vital and profound communication makes demands also on those who are to receive it... demands in the sense of concentration, of genuine effort to receive what is being communicated. ”
—Roger Sessions
Local Dollars Local Sense
In Local Dollars, Local Sense, PCI Fellow and local economy pioneer Michael Shuman shows investors, including the nearly 99% who are unaccredited, how to put their money into building local businesses and resilient regional economies Buy now and receive a discount.
news by category
- Resources
- Regions
- Related Issues
featured content
- Authors
- Dan Allen
- Cecile Andrews
- Sharon Astyk
- Megan Quinn Bachman
- Albert Bates
- Ugo Bardi
- Dan Bednarz
- David Bollier
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall
- Rebecca Burgess
- Sarah Byrnes
- Molly Scott Cato
- Kurt Cobb
- Dave Cohen
- Erik Curren
- Lindsay Curren
- Andrew Curry
- Herman Daly
- Kris De Decker
- Rob Dietz
- Charlotte Du Cann
- Rahul Goswami
- John Michael Greer
- Nate Hagens
- Richard Heinberg
- Øyvind Holmstad
- Rob Hopkins
- Robert Jensen
- Brian Kaller
- Frank Kaminski
- Paul Kingsnorth
- Amanda Kovattana
- Ellen LaConte
- Gene Logsdon
- Kathy McMahon
- Asher Miller
- Bill McKibben
- Rick Munroe
- Tom Murphy
- Andrew Nikiforuk
- Dmitry Orlov
- Christine Patton
- Damien Perrotin
- Dave Pollard
- Joanne Poyourow
- Barath Raghavan
- Wayne Roberts
- Stuart Staniford
- John Thackara
- Gail Tverberg
- Tom Whipple
- More authors...
- Publishers
- ASPO-USA
- Civil Eats
- Climate Progress
- Culture Change
- Energy Bulletin
- Fernand Braudel Center
- Feasta
- HomeGrown
- Nourishing the Planet
- Oil Depletion Analysis Centre
- On the Commons
- OpenDemocracy
- OpenEconomy
- Post Carbon Institute
- Shareable
- Solutions
- The Daly News
- The Oil Drum
- Shareable
- TCLocal
- TomDispatch.com
- Transition Milwaukee
- Transition Network
- Transition Voice
- Yale Environment 360
- Yes! Magazine
- Media Publishers
- Reviews
- Web chats
The Post Carbon Reader
A must-read collection by some of the world’s most provocative thinkers on the key issues shaping our new century. Buy now and receive a 20% discount.








